Wannabe My Slave ?
So you wanna be my slave….this term “SLAVE” is not clearly defined AND….there is a difference of opinion between what it might mean to be my slave. There is personal slavery and then there are clients. The word client, is it a bad word ?
Right now….I am currently seeking personal slaves and I have filled a couple positions offered so I do not really need a houseboy now I have 2.
I do need video slaves & the slave of my dreams right now would be a web designer/graphic designer. It is crazy to do everything myself when I should have slaves tending to my every whim my every need. (laughing)I will post more later in regards to my specific criteria.
I have aquired some AMAZING slave boys recently and I mean they are really just so dedicated and wonderful. Slaves should contribute to making my life easier so I can do what I do best. PLAY….right now my focus is on trying to build an outstanding website.
I feel very fortunate to have the privilage of having slaves. I would like to talk more about slavery and so please comment and tell me your thoughts about slavery.
What is it you seek ? What are your desires in regards to slavery or service to the Mistress ?
I think this is something well worth discussing sooooo jump n here and tell me what ya’ll think.
1
A slave should be willing to devote himself to his Mistress. i seek a Mistress who can use my writing talents, and also can guide me into growing better within myself. A slave should seek to better himself to make him a better slave, whether it is physical or emotional appearence. A Mistress who has high standards of devotion knows that a slave who grows within themselves is more valuable and better able to make a Mistress’ live easier.
2
Developing a superior intellectual and physical lifestyle for both genders, embracing who we truly are at a genetic/biological level and not a product of society. For a male that is a perfectly tamed, obediant animal that strives to serve fully. For the Female it is being free, creative and socially experimental. Males are perfectly designed as slave’s - they can do physical labour, they can think computationally/logically, they’re reproductive material/role is plentiful and therefore less valuable and they can happily support a sexual fixation indefinatly through hardship. Males weakness’s make it the pavlov dog but with added usefullness thrown in!
My brlirf is in that males weakness for sexual fixation is a pathway to his strength. Slavery is an apt but inappropriate ‘title’ given human history, so I prefer ensexment as oppossed to enslavery, but as an adjective describing the behaviour/role of your own ensexed male, calling him a slave I think is acceptable. The dinstinction being that initially the ’slave’ chose to undertake the journey of ensexment knowing full well that it would lead to a state very much akin to slavery including removal or several human rights. So technically it isnt ‘historical slavery’ as that slavery intrinstly involved stealing and holding against one’s own will.
I also do support a one sided monotheism also, in that the male should have a single Female owner, but at the same time also all other Females have a higher authority over him….. and its with the other Female’s in the world that the male provides ’services’ too as required, but he is only a ’slave’ to his Owner.
3
Sorry for the spelling mistake, I should add my one sided Monotheism doesnt extend to Females as I believe they should have the choice of multiple and varied relationships.
4
Outstanding!!!!! I wish all men who consider themselves slaves or call themselves slaves held similar opinions of themselves and continued to hold the Mistress in high regard. Mistresses are all very different and unique women with different requirements.
If one Mistress owns a multitude of slaves each with individual purposes. Does the slave hold expectations of the Mistresses position in life? Is the slave selfish? I find these discussions of slavery more traditional and these traditions and values are more applicable to lifestyle relationships as well as professional ones. I wonder is there some confusion or misconception now that BDSM in mainstream and I wonder if as a Professional Mistress who is also considered to be a “service provider” is she in service to the client. Is a client really a “slave”?
I know what I think……What do you think? More on this please.
As I write I am breathing a sigh of relief. Somehow knowing that some of you truly understand BDSM philosophy is refreshing.
Thank You for your comments.
With Appreciation,
Mistress Simone Kross
5
The critical boundary between slave and client to a professional Mistress is the function of the activity. For example, a slave that has the function to perform tasks for the Mistress should not expect to arrive and encounter the Mistress in a leather catsuit. The work that the Mistress requires is reward enough, while if a slave wants to engage in an activity that involves fetish play that the Mistress performs for clients, then they should make a tribute as well. It really should be all about the Mistress’ requirements, If a slave is helping settle the books, for example, and the Mistress has a desire within Her to collar the slave and ask him or her to do something else, that suits the Mistress that is fine and is wonderful, but we keep going back to the original premise, the duty of a slave is to work to make the Mistress’ life easier, but if a slave thinks he should ask to sleep on the couch of a Mistress all day long, what is he, a slave, or just an annoying house guest. To serve is function well so that the service is valued.
6
I think that slavery develops within a relationship. When I crossed the line between client and slave, I developed strong feelings of devotion and nurturing. In a way it was very masculine. I wanted to protect and nurture someone who had become precious to me. But it was also very submissive. She called the shots and I very much wanted to please her. I think I became more active in the relationship. I would think about what might please her. In a way, I owned my submissiveness. I wanted to be intuitive and selfless. It was an incredibly fulfilling experience, and much more mature than just being a client. Of course, a Domme has to be open to this, and be really good at reading the needs of her clients for this to work. Sometimes, I just sessioned and bought her things she wanted. Other times, I would do her laundry. I really wanted to mold myself to her desires, that was the big difference from just being a client. I felt really good when my submissiveness opened her up to new ways of being dominant, made her more comfortable in using me.
7
Dear Mistress Simone,
I’m a long time, long distant fan of yours from Massachusetts. I also do Web work for a couple of professional dominant women.
In my experience, while you would like a slave do do this Web work for you, you won’t get great work from great people unless you pay. Oh, you can find a slave to help you, but they probably won’t be very good. Good Web designers are busy, even if they’re kinky submissive’s. On balance, if I’m doing unpaid work as a slave, or I have work to be done for a client that paid me money, I have to do the work for the client.
My experience is that for the clients that pay me, including some of the dominant woman, I take the work more seriously in terms of time management. I think having a professional relationship for web work has been beneficial for both parties. Plus, just because I get paid doesn’t mean I’m any less submissive to the Domina. In fact, I might be more submissive and responsive.
And here’s an interesting little development. One of the Mistrees’ I do web work for is beginning to refer clients to me. For all those paying jobs I will give her a percentage of the fee I charge. That’s not only for the referral, but also because I think it’s my job to help support her in any way I can.
Thanks for your web site and wonderful videos.
8
Dear Mistress Simone,
The nature of the effort exerted by the slave might create an expectation by the slave unto the Mistress to ‘mirror’ that effort both as a sign of awareness (and therefore care) but also commitment - that would seem a natural response but something a slave can absorb to empower the Mistress by removing selfish tendancies like that.
My previous post above highlited what I thought about the 2 levels of ’slavery’ versus ’service’ and I generally consider a male can develop into a slave in 2 general methods; 1. a cyclic application of playing a ‘better slave’, or 2. enter a constant lower level of persistant slavery through a live-in relationship/commitment to Female Supremacy (I’d imagine doing both would work best!).
A Professional Mistress might be unable to provide conventional commitment and certain types of care, so perhaps this is offset by more effort and dedicated application of the scene - and in turn making a huge impact on the nature of the experiance. I would say the Professional Mistress is providing a service to the male, but that the male as part of the scene would also be providing more of a service to the Professional Mistress - as expressed by the nature of the activity, financial transaction, and even spiritual energies.
The application of a Female Supremacy BDSM scene would be a very powerful method for the male to enjoy new levels of deep subjugation otherwise not easily possible. The skill and experiance, the unknown, the different, and even perhaps some percpetion of danger provide a valuable service seemingly to the slave but perhaps we should be reconigizing that its also a disproportionally large influence to expand Female Supremacy by making better slaves and educating new people.
Thank you humbly for your audience to my thoughts.